ICT Mark: Readiness for streamlined assessmentThe streamlined approach is designed for schools with 'good' ICT. In such a school, there is likely to be less need to use the self-review framework as a development tool so the focus for them might be to have their self-review validated by an external assessor. This approach might be appropriate for Naacemark or ICT Mark schools due for renewal.
How do you know if a school is ready?Possible approach 1: A school you do not know wellSend the school a copy of the Diagnostic Tool and ask them to discuss their response. Ideally, visit the school to discuss their responses; key questions throughout are ‘how do you know?’ and ‘how can you prove it?’. If they answer ‘yes’ to all of the questions and can provide positive answers to the key questions they are likely to be ready for a streamlined assessment. Suggest that the school works through the self-review framework, ticking the descriptors in all elements, strands and aspects. If the school is at the ICT Mark threshold in all aspects, then complete the recommendation form and submit it. Naace will contact the school to say that your recommendation for a streamlined assessment has been accepted. The school should then complete the ‘Streamlined Assessment Commentary’ document and submit it electronically to Naace, along with their downloaded self-review framework. Possible approach 2: A school you know wellIf you know a school well and are confident that they are at the ICT Mark threshold, you can submit a recommendation form for a Streamlined Assessment, with the agreement of the school, and suggest that they complete the ‘tick boxes’ on the self-review framework and start to complete the ‘Streamlined Assessment Commentary’ document. On completion of these two documents they can apply to Naace for an assessment. Can I assess the school?If you have not supported the school through the process of self-review, you can recommend and assess the school. Discussing a school’s response to the diagnostic tool does not constitute support for the self-review process. ![]() Public
Teachers
Advisers
Naace member
Submitted by: Beverley Parker
Publication date: 06th November 2007 Withdrawal date: --- Created: 26th October 2007 Last updated: 17th June 2008 14:48 Persistent link to this article:http://www.naace.co.uk/501 |
Featured articleNaace Annual Strategic Conference 2009 - Into the Next Generation - Learning Today and TomorrowThe Naace Annual Strategic Conference is the definitive ICT Conference in the UK and is open to all those involved in advancing education through the use of ICT. It brings together colleagues from all over the UK and beyond, together with key players from the government and the industry, and provides a forum to share best practice and exchange ideas. Featured articleRose Review of the Primary CurriculumSir Jim Rose is leading an independent review of the primary curriculum. His initial focus was Curriculum Design and Content, including a key issue for Naace members: What should be the position of ICT within the primary curriculum? Here is Naace's response. Featured articleNaace response to DCSF consultation on Home AccessNaace Members have contributed to the DCSF consultation on the proposed Home Access programme. The DCSF sought views on a number of questions during Spring 2008 and the Naace response is published here. Featured articleParliamentary Committee Inquiry into the National Curriculum: 2008In February 2008, Parliament announced its intention to undertake an Inquiry into the National Curriculum and invited submissions of written evidence. Featured articleNaacemark for Service Providers 2.0Naace has completely revised its quality assurance scheme for service providers to make it consistent with established principles of self-review. Details of this new '2.0' scheme may be found here. |