Naace

We want to hear your voice! Regional Think Tanks - July 2010

Author: Anna Street
Naace Think Tank - we want to hear your voice!
Regional Naace Think Tanks took place up and down the country in the last two weeks in July. The purpose of these events was to open up discussions and collectively share our thoughts about the future direction of ICT in Education.

Our aim was to work together and plan concise key messages – deciding who needs to hear them and what action we want them to take. Our aim is to build a strategy (and practical products) for defending the place of ICT in Education – and to ensure this is shared with as many people as possible.

Each Think Tank produced a variety of discussions and debates - many of which were centered around the pre-set questions below:
• ICT IS Important - Do we agree? Why and how is it important?
• What do we need to do?
• What are our Key Messages? (The USP of ICT in a learning environment)
• Who are the audience? And who needs to hear what?
• What do we want those who hear our message to do? How do we provoke this reaction?
• Building a Strategy (and Practical Products) for defending the place of ICT in Education - What should it include?
• Naace is about community - how can we build the effectiveness of that community so that our VOICE is heard and effective?

All attendees were asked to come prepared to share a one or two minute (max) nano presentation using any one of the above questions as a theme for that presentation. If you would like to share your presentation with Naace members please contact bernadette.brooks@naace.co.uk.

Naace Think Tanks took place throughout July at three locations:
Wednesday 21st July – Bradford - Challenge CLC
Monday 26th July – Bristol Region - Ramada Bristol City
Wednesday 28th July – London Region - Scholastic , Euston

Think Tank AgendaThink Tank Agenda (24k bytes)

Report from the first Regional Think Tank in Bradford



Many thanks to our members Julie Frankland and Tim Scratcherd for the following report from Bradford:

Forty two Naace members from all sectors of the association travelled from far and wide to Bradford Challenge CLC to participate in a lively and constructive day. In addition, 145 people joined the think tank virtually through the video stream, Twitter, Slideshare and Wallwisher. The summary that follows cannot capture the vibrancy and range of discussion, or the passion of the participants, but it does represent the key outcomes.

Purposes of Day

  • To achieve consensus from participants on the role of ICT in education.
  • To agree key messages and audiences.
  • To devise strategies for engaging these audiences with these messages.

Context

On 26 June 2010, 36 representatives from 25 organisations met in London to draft a consensus view of the role of ICT in education. This was sent to Mr Michael Gove. Since then, over 100 organisations have pledged their support and commitment to this view. Although Michael Gove is unable to meet with Naace at this time, Mr Gibb has expressed interest in the work of Naace and hopes to be in a position to meet with Naace in the future.

Mark Chambers introduced the Schools System Draft Structural Reform Plan as a description of current Government policy and a framework for discussion. The key elements of this are:

  • Greater autonomy for schools / Independent state schools (Free Schools and Academies)
  • Improved parental choice / Independent state schools (Free Schools and Academies)
  • More support for the poorest / Pupil premium
  • Whole system improvement / Reducing bureaucracy.
These were used as prompts to elicit consensus on the unique selling points (USP's) of ICT in advancing education.

Issues Arising

  • Need clarification around what is meant by achievement and attainment. What will they use as measures and for accountability?
  • What does the Government see as its core business in terms of education? (What should the Government do and what should it not do, and leave to schools.) (Use as a ‘hook’ when we do manage a meeting!)
  • There is a lack of consistency amongst schools about their role and purpose. For example, some believe that all learners should have an entitlement to a broad and balanced curriculum and relevant learning experiences and others believe their role is to prepare pupils for the assessment regime (exams!).
  • Whole system improvement – the culture of the coalition is competition and market forces to drive up standards. Conversely, there was a strong view from participants supporting the concept of a universal entitlement.
  • More support for the poorest – what does this mean? ‘Support’ will be cash to the schools but will it ensure that pupils will have tangible benefits?
  • International models – questions over currency of data and information, and transferability to the UK setting, were raised.

Key Messages

  • Entitlement and equity as opposed to a post code lottery!
  • ICT has USP's as:
    • A shaper of the curriculum: ICT is re-shaping the world and learners need to be educated for the world in which they live, not least to ensure that UK PLC remains competitive.
    • A tool to support management: ICT is essential for the management of information about learners, to inform progress, and personalisation; provides efficiencies and radically improves communications.
    • An enhancer of learning and teaching: learners see education as relevant when ICT is used as it reflects ‘their’ world and the world outside; outstanding schools always make effective use of ICT; ICT engages disaffected learners and empowers learners with disabilities – it enables them to access learning and teaching.
    • A subject of the curriculum: with more relevance than, for example, learning about the past.
  • In a market place of schools, ICT is a strong selling point.
  • ICT is an integral part of life and should be an integral part of education. It is not about grabbing the next piece of kit, it is about empowering learners to be able to choose and use the most appropriate tools creatively – this is what industry wants and what Naace strives to promote.

What do we do and how do we do it?

Participants worked in groups to identify practical products defending the place of ICT in education. They were tasked to identify a theme, the relevant audience, strategies/technologies to engage the audience with the theme and the reaction looked for.
Themes identified included:

  • Pupil voice, Learner Charter
  • Engaging readers of the Daily Mail
  • What schools need from Naace
  • Engaging the reluctant teacher
  • Engaging local authorities
  • Parental engagement, VLEs and online reporting
  • Free schools
  • Working with schools (new and old) to develop a vision for 21st Century Learning.
Naace are taking these themes and, together with input from the Bristol and London events, will seek to refine a strategy to take the work forward.


London Think Tank report



The following article brings you the key messages and recommendations from the latest regional Naace Think Tank reflecting on the direction of ICT in education in the current political environment. Thanks to Allison Allen for collating all the notes recorded at the London Think Tank on 28 July 2010. Special thanks also go to Scholastic for providing the venue and refreshments on the day and lots of useful resources for colleagues to take away too! Please see here for full details of the events that took place.


Key messages

About ICT:

  • There is confusion about the terms for ICT/IT/TEL/DL. Should it be “Technology”?
  • ICT means: the subject (knowledge, skills/applied/world of work/computer specific; higher thinking, and real world contexts); the cross-curricula enabler; the management tool (data, progress, personalisation); the infrastructure/utility; and the transformational technology!
  • ICT is global and learners need to be educated (curriculum) to survive, enjoy good life chances, grow and take advantage of life in their world; assure continued economic viability/market leadership of UK plc.
  • ICT engages the disengaged, empowers the able and the differently-abled, enhances equalities and enriches human diversity.
ICT:
  • should be an equal right;
  • has a role to play in home/school interaction – enabling anytime, anywhere learning (which may be school driven);
  • is a relevant and uniquely ground-breaking subject of the curriculum.
Naace:
  • in particular through ICT Mark has a USP of expertise;
  • is identified as an agency of change with professional commitment and strategies for change.

Recommendations and ideas

Participants used table discussions to identify strategic products to defend the place of ICT in education; themes, audience, strategy, technology, anticipated reactions.

Themes and messages included:

  • We need to raise the importance of Learner Voice by targeting Youth Parliament and Junior local politicians.
  • Work with Free Schools and new Academies to ensure technology is there to help parents. We can offer expertise and support to staff and SMT of these new schools which importantly, the government will be monitoring. Naace is a broad church that can address many audiences.
  • Appoint a PR officer with TV awareness, capable of using multi media/multi channels. This could be shared with a sponsor to raise the profile of Naace and communicate news via various media.
  • Engaging with the government – select 5 key policy areas, not just ICT in order to reach wider audience. Draw parallel with products to support key areas in time for CSR!
  • Harness Big Society by talking to parents and communities.
  • Think about a different supply chain model.
  • Create repository of key documents and evidence including impact (start with/cooperate Becta).
  • Pupil voice, Youth Parliament
  • Information area for parents on Naace website eg e-safety, digital literacy.
  • Develop resources such as pre-prepared presentations with voice-over. Continue CPD4Free – a valuable resource.
  • Showcase what good looks like.
  • Aggregate good blogs from Naace members. (open to all)
  • Multi-agency, multi-channel resource on lines of Teachmeet.
  • Schools will miss local network meetings – can we develop a franchise model to replace them?
  • Parental engagement, VLEs and online reporting.
  • Free schools, Academies, expertise, support, visioning – for parents too.
  • Policy makers need to acknowledge the importance of ICT without throwing money at it to show its value. This puts us in a stronger position to help schools if senior leaders see ICT is valued...
  • There was a strong feeling in London that there is great pride and passion in Naace.
Naace will take the ideas from all these Think Tank events, and seek to refine a strategy to take the work forward.

Many thanks...

Thanks to Planet PC, for enabling us to live stream from the Bradford Think Tank. Thanks also to all the team at Challenge CLC for playing host and Education Bradford for their support. To the volunteers who offered to contribute to the report including Julie Frankland and Tim Scratcherd and possibly others - many thanks also.

Thanks to Douglas Woods for filming the Bristol event and to Fiona Aubrey Smith, Lucinda Searle and Neil Tuttiett for their assistance with direction on the day.  Our report writer for this event was Charlotte Wall from Brother and contributions may well have been received from others too. Thanks to all. Software4Students, www.software4students.co.uk, provided sponsorship for this event and for this we are most grateful too.

In London Rebecca Jones and her team provided a fantastic venue at Scholastic, www.scholastic.co.uk, and looked after us so well throughout the day. Gareth Davies was our volunteer camera man and film editor and Allison Allen collated the London Think Tank Report with inputs from Nick Speller and others too I am sure.

We are compiling final reports at present - watch this space for publications.

Thank you to other Naace Sponsoring Partners for offering to accommodate us.:
Steljes Ltd, Just2Easy Ltd, BESA, Ergo Computing UK Ltd and Brother UK Ltd.

We want to hear your voice! Regional Think Tanks - July 2010
Regional Naace Think Tanks took place up and down the country in the last two weeks in July. The purpose of these events was to open up discussions and collectively share our thoughts about the future direction of ICT in Education.

Our aim was to work together and plan concise key messages – deciding who needs to hear them and what action we want them to take. Our aim is to build a strategy (and practical products) for defending the place of ICT in Education – and to ensure this is shared with as many people as possible.

Each Think Tank produced a variety of discussions and debates - many of which were centered around the pre-set questions below:
• ICT IS Important - Do we agree? Why and how is it important?
• What do we need to do?
• What are our Key Messages? (The USP of ICT in a learning environment)
• Who are the audience? And who needs to hear what?
• What do we want those who hear our message to do? How do we provoke this reaction?
• Building a Strategy (and Practical Products) for defending the place of ICT in Education - What should it include?
• Naace is about community - how can we build the effectiveness of that community so that our VOICE is heard and effective?

All attendees were asked to come prepared to share a one or two minute (max) nano presentation using any one of the above questions as a theme for that presentation. If you would like to share your presentation with Naace members please contact bernadette.brooks@naace.co.uk.

Naace Think Tanks took place throughout July at three locations:
Wednesday 21st July – Bradford - Challenge CLC
Monday 26th July – Bristol Region - Ramada Bristol City
Wednesday 28th July – London Region - Scholastic , Euston

Naace Think Tank - we want to hear your voice!